Panel Design
- SheepdogRD
- Proprietor
- Posts: 930
- Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2010 5:41 pm
- Location: West of Atlanta, GA
Panel Design
With about 7 weeks to go before our Highlander kit is ready for us, I thought I'd get a head start on designing the instrument panel, and I could use some advice. We'll probably go with a single glass panel and some steam backup.
Four questions:
I plan to go up to the factory next week, so I'll take pictures and measurements to help avoid putting radios where there are fuselage tubes. But I've never laid out a panel. (1) Other than placing the basic instruments for an easy scan, what would you advise for a layout?
I see that the old "epanelbuilder" software seems to have gone away, so I'll probably use CorelDraw or Sketchup. Panel layout seems primarily a matter of TLAR (That Looks About Right) design. (2) Is there panel layout software that seems to work well?
I bought Bob Nuckolls' book, AeroElectric Connection, but it doesn't cover panel design. (3) Is there a publication you'd recommend?
(4) What have you used to design your panels?
Thanks . . .
Dick
P.S. To make it easy to quote these questions, here they are again:
(1) Other than placing the basic instruments for an easy scan, what would you advise for a layout?
(2) Is there panel layout software that seems to work well?
(3) Is there a publication you'd recommend?
(4) What have you used to design your panels?
Four questions:
I plan to go up to the factory next week, so I'll take pictures and measurements to help avoid putting radios where there are fuselage tubes. But I've never laid out a panel. (1) Other than placing the basic instruments for an easy scan, what would you advise for a layout?
I see that the old "epanelbuilder" software seems to have gone away, so I'll probably use CorelDraw or Sketchup. Panel layout seems primarily a matter of TLAR (That Looks About Right) design. (2) Is there panel layout software that seems to work well?
I bought Bob Nuckolls' book, AeroElectric Connection, but it doesn't cover panel design. (3) Is there a publication you'd recommend?
(4) What have you used to design your panels?
Thanks . . .
Dick
P.S. To make it easy to quote these questions, here they are again:
(1) Other than placing the basic instruments for an easy scan, what would you advise for a layout?
(2) Is there panel layout software that seems to work well?
(3) Is there a publication you'd recommend?
(4) What have you used to design your panels?
Richard Holtz
Highlander N570L -- Ms. Tonka -- in gestation
If just enough is really good, then too much ought to be perfect.
Highlander N570L -- Ms. Tonka -- in gestation
If just enough is really good, then too much ought to be perfect.
-
- Forum Regular
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 8:10 pm
- Location: Sexsmith Ab Canada
Re: Panel Design Software
I'm pretty sure Aircraft Spruce has a panel planner on there web site and you can pick from all the components they sell.
- scubarider2
- Topic Moderator
- Posts: 1086
- Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 7:03 pm
- Location: Cleveland, GA
Re: Panel Design Software
I did not use any software. All I did was chose the instruments that I wanted and laid them out after making the panel. You can do a search on panels here and get some good info as well.
Dennis
Dennis
Live as though you were going to die tomorrow, learn as though you were going to live forever...
- rmullins
- Veteran Member
- Posts: 326
- Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 8:01 pm
Re: Panel Design Software
I didn't use panel software, (and I'm a computer geek if ever there was). I just made paper cutouts of my instruments and then moved them around on the panel until I was satisfied. And you're right about the tubes behind the panel, they can bite you (a few curse words were spoken.....)
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Rick Mullins #144
Cincinnati, Oh
Cincinnati, Oh
- SheepdogRD
- Proprietor
- Posts: 930
- Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2010 5:41 pm
- Location: West of Atlanta, GA
Re: Panel Design
I've been cruising the forum and the web looking at instrument panel designs. One that fascinates me is right here on this forum.
One of the interesting things Jim Pekola did on his Highlander Extreme was to change the shape of his panel. It's hard to tell from the pictures, but it appears that he brought it out about 5 inches, and arched the top of it like the Kitfox panel. While that reduces the available panel width, it also provides more panel height, and probably means everything is reachable without straining in the seatbelts.
The first two pictures are from the Highlander Extreme thread (http://www.wingsforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=218&t=18930). Here's the image where I noticed the depth change:
In the next two pictures, we can compare the added panel depth in the Extreme to the standard flat panel in Gary's Back Country Monster (the image of the Extreme is flipped so it's easier to compare the two panels):
The added depth appears to provide much more working space in the panel. It seems like many instrument panels are so crammed with stuff that it's tough to work on them, and this might make the panel easier to maintain and modify.
I also noticed that Jim has extended the top of the panel even further. If we combine that with extremely reflective window tint on the top window, like Steve (taildrgfun) is using, it would probably eliminate most sun glare on the panel.
One interesting question comes up: in the picture of the Back Country Monster, the pilot's shins are pretty close to the panel. If that panel was extended like the Extreme panel, would there be a conflict between shins and panel for a tall pilot, or would there be just enough space there? Hmmmm.
One last thing: wouldn't those flat spaces on the sides of the panel be good places for fresh air ducts?
Dick
One of the interesting things Jim Pekola did on his Highlander Extreme was to change the shape of his panel. It's hard to tell from the pictures, but it appears that he brought it out about 5 inches, and arched the top of it like the Kitfox panel. While that reduces the available panel width, it also provides more panel height, and probably means everything is reachable without straining in the seatbelts.
The first two pictures are from the Highlander Extreme thread (http://www.wingsforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=218&t=18930). Here's the image where I noticed the depth change:
In the next two pictures, we can compare the added panel depth in the Extreme to the standard flat panel in Gary's Back Country Monster (the image of the Extreme is flipped so it's easier to compare the two panels):
The added depth appears to provide much more working space in the panel. It seems like many instrument panels are so crammed with stuff that it's tough to work on them, and this might make the panel easier to maintain and modify.
I also noticed that Jim has extended the top of the panel even further. If we combine that with extremely reflective window tint on the top window, like Steve (taildrgfun) is using, it would probably eliminate most sun glare on the panel.
One interesting question comes up: in the picture of the Back Country Monster, the pilot's shins are pretty close to the panel. If that panel was extended like the Extreme panel, would there be a conflict between shins and panel for a tall pilot, or would there be just enough space there? Hmmmm.
One last thing: wouldn't those flat spaces on the sides of the panel be good places for fresh air ducts?
Dick
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Richard Holtz
Highlander N570L -- Ms. Tonka -- in gestation
If just enough is really good, then too much ought to be perfect.
Highlander N570L -- Ms. Tonka -- in gestation
If just enough is really good, then too much ought to be perfect.
- scubarider2
- Topic Moderator
- Posts: 1086
- Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 7:03 pm
- Location: Cleveland, GA
Re: Panel Design
Just don't forget the iPod holder which is the most important instrument on the panel.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Live as though you were going to die tomorrow, learn as though you were going to live forever...
- rmullins
- Veteran Member
- Posts: 326
- Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 8:01 pm
Re: Panel Design
I had thought at some point I might redo my panel, and bringing it farther back was one of the reasons. Gives you more flexibility in placing instruments, plus it puts the gauges closer to these old eyes.
I'm not so sure about making it taller though. I made mine as low as I possibly could. Forward visibility on a tail dragger is always compromised on the ground, but with the panel low it really is not that bad.
I'm not so sure about making it taller though. I made mine as low as I possibly could. Forward visibility on a tail dragger is always compromised on the ground, but with the panel low it really is not that bad.
Rick Mullins #144
Cincinnati, Oh
Cincinnati, Oh
- stede52
- Premium Member
- Posts: 1066
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 11:40 am
- Location: Carnation, WA
Re: Panel Design
Here's a couple of pictures of Jims Extreme panel which he extended because he wanted the intruments closer.
By the way the windshield edge of the boot cowl determines how tall you can make your panel before your forward view begins to become obstructed. To maximize the size of my panel I sit in the plane and build a panel template where the top of the panel matches the curve of the boot cowl windshield edge. So the lower you get your boot cowl the more forward viewing you'll have, however, that also reduces the height of your panel unless you build your panel so it extends below and aft of the horizontal cross brace, and then you need to make sure your control sticks pass under the panel. I when through all of this on my panel
Steve D
By the way the windshield edge of the boot cowl determines how tall you can make your panel before your forward view begins to become obstructed. To maximize the size of my panel I sit in the plane and build a panel template where the top of the panel matches the curve of the boot cowl windshield edge. So the lower you get your boot cowl the more forward viewing you'll have, however, that also reduces the height of your panel unless you build your panel so it extends below and aft of the horizontal cross brace, and then you need to make sure your control sticks pass under the panel. I when through all of this on my panel
Steve D
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Steve D N419LD
- SheepdogRD
- Proprietor
- Posts: 930
- Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2010 5:41 pm
- Location: West of Atlanta, GA
Re: Panel Design
Thank you all -- that's good information.
Dennis, we'll probably add music through the headsets. To be honest, music is a higher priority for Josh than for me. I enjoy just monitoring the airplane and the radio traffic.
Pilot position will be an issue on our plane, because Josh is about 4" taller than I am. I plan to experiment with a removable cushion for the left seat, so our eyes will be at about the same level, no matter which of us is flying left seat.
If that doesn't work, we may have to build another Highlander for him . . .
Dennis, we'll probably add music through the headsets. To be honest, music is a higher priority for Josh than for me. I enjoy just monitoring the airplane and the radio traffic.
Yep, these eyes are old, too, and that was one of the things that appealed to me: I'd like to see the gauges better.rmullins wrote: . . . plus (the extended panel) puts the gauges closer to these old eyes.
Steve, the pictures help tremendously in figuring out how to build an extended panel. Thank you. Do you know how far out Jim extended his panel? By the way, I see that I have a picture of the panel you put in N419SD, but not your panel in N419BD. Is your new panel much different? I'd love to see any pictures you have, including pictures of it under construction.stede52 wrote:Here's a couple of pictures of Jims Extreme panel which he extended because he wanted the intruments closer.
rmullins wrote:I'm not so sure about making it taller though. I made mine as low as I possibly could. Forward visibility on a tail dragger is always compromised on the ground, but with the panel low it really is not that bad.
I agree -- I don't want the panel to obscure my view outside. I've wondered about visibility in a Kitfox, which has a higher arch on the standard panel. I had planned to sit in the finished seat and then make the panel just low enough that I could still see a little of the engine cowling over it.stede52 wrote:By the way the windshield edge of the boot cowl determines how tall you can make your panel before your forward view begins to become obstructed. To maximize the size of my panel I sit in the plane and build a panel template where the top of the panel matches the curve of the boot cowl windshield edge. So the lower you get your boot cowl the more forward viewing you'll have . . .
Pilot position will be an issue on our plane, because Josh is about 4" taller than I am. I plan to experiment with a removable cushion for the left seat, so our eyes will be at about the same level, no matter which of us is flying left seat.
If that doesn't work, we may have to build another Highlander for him . . .
Those are good design tips. They make me think I'd better hold off on this design work until I get back up to the factory and can get some accurate measurements. I had planned to go this week, but Atlanta and the surrounding area have been effectively closed for three days because the roads are so iced over. They're still pretty messy, so I'll probably hold off until next week, now.stede52 wrote:. . . So the lower you get your boot cowl the more forward viewing you'll have, however, that also reduces the height of your panel unless you build your panel so it extends below and aft of the horizontal cross brace, and then you need to make sure your control sticks pass under the panel. I when through all of this on my panel
Richard Holtz
Highlander N570L -- Ms. Tonka -- in gestation
If just enough is really good, then too much ought to be perfect.
Highlander N570L -- Ms. Tonka -- in gestation
If just enough is really good, then too much ought to be perfect.
- stede52
- Premium Member
- Posts: 1066
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 11:40 am
- Location: Carnation, WA
Re: Panel Design
My panel ended up being 12" tall at the middle, I dropped my panel 2" lower and 2" aft of the cross brace. The main reason for that was due to the two 10" Dynon panels. By the way a 4" seat cushion is the best thing you can do for your BUTT
I'll take some pics of my panel the next time I get to the plane, weather has been crap around here also, but nothing like the east coast
Steve D
I'll take some pics of my panel the next time I get to the plane, weather has been crap around here also, but nothing like the east coast
Steve D
Steve D N419LD
- SheepdogRD
- Proprietor
- Posts: 930
- Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2010 5:41 pm
- Location: West of Atlanta, GA
Re: Panel Design
Thanks, Steve. This isn't a rush. Atlanta-area roads are just getting back to normal, because road departments here aren't equipped to work on icy roads. People in Atlanta simply don't know what to do on ice; we're transplanted northerners, and are experienced enough with it to know the best bet is to stay close to home 'til it melts. This weekend should take us back to normal conditions.stede52 wrote:My panel ended up being 12" tall at the middle, I dropped my panel 2" lower and 2" aft of the cross brace. The main reason for that was due to the two 10" Dynon panels.
I'll take some pics of my panel the next time I get to the plane, weather has been crap around here also, but nothing like the east coast
Yeah, we want some good seats. We may even invest in a 2"-thick twin-size memory foam mattress pad, and put one or more layers in our seat cushions. I wonder what Oregon Aero (http://www.oregonaero.com) does to make their seats so good.stede52 wrote:By the way a 4" seat cushion is the best thing you can do for your BUTT
Richard Holtz
Highlander N570L -- Ms. Tonka -- in gestation
If just enough is really good, then too much ought to be perfect.
Highlander N570L -- Ms. Tonka -- in gestation
If just enough is really good, then too much ought to be perfect.